Paterson News, March 22, 1980

From The Elvis Costello Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
... Bibliography ...
727677787980818283
848586878889909192
939495969798990001
020304050607080910
111213141516171819
202122232425 26 27 28


Paterson News

New Jersey publications

US publications by state
  • ALAKARAZCA
  • COCTDCDEFL
  • GAHI   IA      ID      IL
  • IN   KSKYLA   MA
  • MDME   MIMNMO
  • MSMTNC  ND  NE
  • NHNJNMNVNY
  • OHOKORPARI
  • SCSDTNTXUT
  • VAVTWAWIWY

-

Not much to get happy about


Stuart Margulies

Elvis Costello has always been an easy target for analysis. Unfortunately, once you try to examine his psyche through his records and his actions, you find he defies explanation.

Let's start with the title of the new album by Costello and his Attractions. It is Get Happy!! (Columbia), but what really does that mean? Is it an admonition for his fans to "get happy?" Or does it tell us that Elvis Costello and the Attractions "get happy" after the British singer/songwriter has made a career thus far out of being dour, angry and down on his luck?

I'm not really certain, but listening to Get Happy!! does not lend the impression that Costello has a new outlook on life. His old themes — infidelity, failed romances, screwed up relationships, distrust and what he believes is a continuing bias by the world toward him remain on this long playing LP.

If Costello is still not happy with his perception of how the world treats him, then I'm not altogether pleased with his treatment of his fans.

On his three previous albums, the Briton showed a flair for both lyrics and melody that very few performers have equalled. It seems, however, that on the new record he and longtime producer Nick Lowe have gotten too adventurous. We are presented with 20 songs (that's twice as many as on the average single album) and a variety of styles, some of them new and different to Costello.

Perhaps Elvis can be accused of trying to bite off more than he can chew. There are a lot of average Costello songs here, and those could easily have been avoided without diminishing from his better work.

The singer tries hard rock, r&b, ballads, pop and arty rock, plus variations on styles — and his tempos are mixed and varied. But, unlike his first three records, Get Happy!! never hits a groove or leaves a solid mood on which to build. The good songs seem to end too soon; the poorer ones, despite the two minute-average playing time, seem strained.

Costello the tune writer has been much better. The hooks on this album don't hold as fast as on previous work, and his occasional habit of using other performers' riffs gets annoying. When you're as a good a songwriter as Costello, your work is expected to remain consistently top-notch. Still, below quality Elvis is better than the best work of most of the other singer/songwriters around today.

I'm also displeased with Costello the wordsmith. First of all, why can't he include his lyrics with the album? For a person who prides himself on words, he makes it difficult to follow his thinking, especially since his singing style is so varied on Get Happy!! His words are sometimes indecipherable.

Those that are understandable lead us to the realization that his themes are the same as always, as I said earlier. Unfortunately, his words don't have the sharp, smart or smugly cute tones that we've heard before. Instead, Costello resorts more and more to plays on words and unusual phrases and rhymes that sound nice but may not have much meaning. He does connect on a few, though, especially on the song "Possession":

"You lack lust, you're so lackluster.
Is that all the strength you can muster'?"

Costello succeeds the best on two non-originals with r&b flavor: "I Can't Stand Up for Falling Down" and "I Stand Accused." Of his originals, his two slowest numbers are by far his best songs.

"New Amsterdam," described by one reviewer as a "waltz," has what can be termed a beautiful melody. But most impressive is "Riot Act," on which he pleads with a woman not to dump him. This song contains his most impassioned singing we have yet heard.

So, as long as the flame still burns, Costello is capable of making incomparable music. That's at least one thing to get happy about.


Tags: Get Happy!!The AttractionsNick LoweI Can't Stand Up For Falling DownI Stand AccusedNew AmsterdamRiot Act




Photo by Keith Morris.
1980-03-22 Paterson News photo 01 km.jpg

-

The News, March 22, 1980


Stuart Margulies reviews Get Happy!!.

Images

1980-03-22 Paterson News page 31.jpg
Page scan.





Radio, Radio


Stuart Margulies

Speaking of Costello, was it not he who sang in "Radio, Radio," his angry ode to conservative programming: "And the radio is in the hands of such a lot of fools trying to anesthetize the way that you feel" ?

Those words seem to be swirling around the New York area lately, especially among those in the 18-30 year-old bracket who listen to rock music radio. WPIX-FM, which had once again made it pleasurable to listen to New York FM radio, has done another turnaround by changing its format for the worse. The station, which became the beacon in these parts for new wave/ rock/r&b/vintage oldies, now offers the worst in schlock rock. And, we are told, it will lead to a Top 40 format.

Three weeks ago, one could tune to 101.9 FM and hear a set that might have included songs by the Clash, Junior Walker and the All Stars, the Specials, Mi Sex, Jerry Lee Lewis and Nick Lowe. Now, one would hear a set that includes: Styx, Carly Simon, Kansas, Bob Dylan and Fleetwood Mac.

What it all centers on is format. PIX 102, as it is known, focused on the new sound in music. With some new disc jockeys, ideas and a bit of courage, the station last year catered to an audience that enjoyed new, exciting and danceable music. PIX was different in that it played purely rock music — that new wave music that avoided the hard core excesses of punk and could almost gain acceptance by a mainstream rock crowd.

The station called this music "the next 25 years of rock 'n' roll." It took a modern approach, with such features as the "No Major Label Show" and "The New Rock 'n' Roll Show" for new or unsigned artists and the "PIX Penthouse Party" that featured several hours straight of pure dance music.

But with the dismissal of such djs as Joe (from Chicago) Piasek, Meg Griffin and Dan Neer, the departure of Jane Hamburger, the toning down of the other jocks on the air, the changed music format and most tellingly, the hiring of a firm to act as a programming consultant, PIX has obviously given up on something wonderful and replaced it with something sterile, standard and strictly commercial.

We can protest until we're blue in the face, but I doubt it will help. The bottom line is the dollar sign, and there is plenty of doubt that a new rock music format can be commercially successful in attracting listeners and grabbing the advertising dollars.

A look at the statistics may bear this out. This past week, the Associated Press wrote a story about the rankings for audience shares for the major New York City area radio stations, both AM and FM. The results did not speak well for PIX.

The station, which some said had improved its listeners' share percentage, apparently did not. it finished with a .9 share, about where it was when the new rock format began, and placed 25th out of the 40 stations. Unfortunately for WPIX, most of the stations that fell even lower are suburban stations, unlike the New York City-based PIX.

Most stations that play some form of rock also dropped in their listeners' share percentage. So the big question is, why can't the New York City area successfully support a commercial station that plays new rock'n'roll? Is our buying power considered that small that folks like you and me can't hear much of what we want on the radio?

Let me hear from you. There must be something rock fans in the area can do. Drop me a line on your thoughts.

-



Back to top

External links