Melody Maker, September 13, 1986: Difference between revisions

From The Elvis Costello Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(start page)
 
(formatting / default sorting / update browser)
 
(7 intermediate revisions by the same user not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Bibliography header}}
{{Bibliography header}}
{{Bibliography index}}
{{:Bibliography index}}
{{Melody Maker index}}
{{:Melody Maker index}}
{{magazine index}}
{{Bibliography article header}}
{{Bibliography article header}}
<center><h3> ... </h3></center>
<center><h3> Blood & Chocolate </h3></center>
<center>''' Elvis Costello </center>
----
----
<center> Simon Reynolds </center>
<center> Simon Reynolds </center>
----
----
{{Bibliography text}}
{{Bibliography text}}
Another one?! So soon?! How much quality product can a body digest in a single year?


[[image:article.jpg]]
Elvis Costello is undone by his own prolific stamina and consistency. A month ago I made an unlikely comparison between Costello and Cabaret Voltaire: the shared problem of routine brilliance. The possibility of his surprising us recedes because of his prior accumulated excellence. Each time, it becomes steadily more difficult to argue that you NEED another Costello record. But his fans aren't buying "surprise" anyway. Costello services a stable demand for one sure voice of sanity and compassion. It's a matter of keeping the faith.
 
Equally, it becomes less and less plausible to present Costello as the thorn in pop's flesh, a radical intrusion of intelligence, simply because these days he barely interacts with pop at all. Costello, all of us in fact, inhabit a little world that's drifted apart from the mainstream, a world whose parameters are night-time radio and the music press. "Progressive pop" occupies a different space to pop altogether, perhaps equivalent to that occupied by literature 50 years ago. Nothing is in jeopardy.
 
Everything valuable about Costello — craft, dignity, content, depth — actually disqualifies him from the pop race. Pop was always meant to be surface flash, rupture, contrivance, a spree of strangeness — not good work and firm conscience. Everything about POP! should be capable of absorption within a matter of moments. With Costello, you have to work.
 
So here comes a fresh glut of WORDS — a round of media hagiography, no doubt, plus a mass of artfully tangled statements for us to decipher. These days, when Elvis speaks out, the result is a prolix, purple sprawl of placenames and mixed metaphors, leaving only the vague impression that he's pointing the finger at something. Much more useful are the more private songs, like "I Want You," a stark, extended gasp of choke longing.
 
Elsewhere, Costello's writing seems to increase in opacity as he turns over and over his familiar concerns — domestic deceit, doomed relationships, bread and circuses, the hegemony of the trivial and the tawdry. You come to wish he'd be less zealous in his anxiety to avoid insulting our on American traditional musics, the stance is so fiercely anti-American that these roots musics and regional just as much under threat of extinct mainstream American culture (MTV, yuppie sensibility) as our own culture anti-modern cultures are a form of a Americanism within America, which we caaw on.
 
But such dissent seems destined to remain isolated and contained. No matter how he struggles to shake up the settled state of his career — this year's peculiar gambit of "murdering" the Costello persona — Elvis Costello is doomed to make only big splashes in a small pond, our pond. "Hang The Deejay" could well have been Elvis Costello's very own anthem.


{{cx}}
{{cx}}
''Remainder of article unavailable.
{{Article needed}}


{{Bibliography notes header}}
{{Bibliography notes header}}


{{Bibliography notes}}
{{Bibliography notes}}
{{Bibliography next
|prev = Melody Maker, July 12, 1986
|next = Melody Maker, November 15, 1986
}}
'''Melody Maker, September 13, 1986
'''Melody Maker, September 13, 1986
----
----
Line 22: Line 43:


{{Bibliography images}}
{{Bibliography images}}
[[image:1986-09-13 Melody Maker cover.jpg|900x120px]]
 
[[image:1986-09-13 Melody Maker cover.jpg|x120px]]
<br><small>Cover.</small>
<br><small>Cover.</small>


Line 31: Line 53:
==External links==
==External links==
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melody_Maker Wikipedia: Melody Maker]
*[http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Melody_Maker Wikipedia: Melody Maker]
*[http://reynoldsretro.blogspot.com/2015/07/elvis-costello.html Blogspot.com: Simon Reynolds]


[[Category:Bibliography|Melody Maker 1986-09-13]]
{{DEFAULTSORT:Melody Maker 1986-09-13}}
[[Category:Bibliography 1986|Melody Maker 1986-09-13]]
[[Category:Bibliography]]
[[Category:Bibliography 1986]]
[[Category:Melody Maker| Melody Maker 1986-09-13]]
[[Category:Melody Maker| Melody Maker 1986-09-13]]
[[Category:Magazine articles|Melody Maker 1986-09-13]]
[[Category:Magazine articles]]
[[Category:Album reviews|Melody Maker 1986-09-13]]
[[Category:Album reviews]]
[[Category:Blood & Chocolate reviews|Melody Maker 1986-09-13]]
[[Category:Blood & Chocolate reviews]]
[[Category:Article needed|Melody Maker 1986-09-13]]
[[Category:Article needed]]
<!--   
 
original google cache:
 
melody maker - 13TH SEPTEMBER 1986 - BLOOD ON THE ELVIS COSTELLO AND THE ATTRACTIONS BLOOD AND CHOCOLATE
 
 
Imp ANOTHER one?! So soon?! How much quality product can a body digest in a single year?
 
Elvis Costello is undone by his own prolific stamina and consistency. A month ago I made an unlikely comparison between Costello and Cabaret Voltaire: the shared problem of routine brilliance. The possibility of his surprising us recedes because of his prior accumulated excellence. Each time, it becomes steadily more difficult to argue that you NEED another Costello record. But his fans aren't buying "surprise" anyway. Costello services a stable demand for one sure voice of sanity and compassion. It's a matter of keeping the faith.
 
Equally, it becomes less and less plausible to present Costello as the thorn in pop's flesh, a radical intrusion of intelligence, simply because these days he barely interacts with pop at all. Costello, all of us in fact, inhabit a little world that's drifted apart from the mainstream, a world whose parameters are night-time radio and the music press. "Progessive pop" occupies a different space to pop altogether, perhaps equivalent to that occupied by literature 50 years ago. Nothing is in jeopardy.
 
Everything valuable about Costello - craft, dignity, content, depth - actually disqualifies him from the pop race. Pop was always meant to be surface flash, rupture, contrivance, a spree of strangeness - not good work and firm conscience. Everything about POP! should be capable of absorption within a matter of moments. With Costello, you have to work.
 
Sg here comes a fresh glut of WORDS = a round of media hagiography, no doubt, plus a mass of artfully tangled statements for us to decipher. These days, when Elvis speaks out, the result is a prolix, purple sprawl of placenames and mixed metaphors, leaving only the vague impression that he's pointing the finger at something. Much more useful are the more private songs, like "I Want You", a stark, extended gasp of choke longing.
 
Elsewhere, Costello's writing seems to increase in opacity as he turns over and over his familiar concerns - domestic deceit, doomed relationships, bread and circuses, the hegemony of the trivial and the tawdry. You come to wish he'd be less zealous in his anxiety to avoid insulting our on American traditional musics, whe stance is so fiercely anti-American. that these roots musics and regional just as much under threat of extincti mainstream American culture (MTV, yuppie sensibility) as our own culture anti-modern cultures are a form of a Americanism within America, which we caaw on.
 
But such dissent seems destined to remain isolated and contained. No matter how he struggles to shake up the settled state of hisCareer - this year's peculiar gambit of "murdering" the Costello persona - Elvis Costello is doomed to make only big splashes in a small pond, our pond. "Hang The Deejay" could well have been Elvis Costello's very own anthem.
 
SIMON REYNOLDS intelligence. I reckon you'd have to be pretty learned to unravel Costello's dense play with slan and with his own and pop's mythol The music is great to listen to - a nc , organic sound, miles superior to the overlit and picked-out production on the last LP with the Attra000,10, "Goodbye Cruel World". It treads a fine line between sounding earthy and sounding muddy. The obvious reference point is Dylan - some= songs with a country feel, others mote garagy, with a discreet scattering of psychedelic and Byrdsy motifs throughout.
 
What puzzled me initially was Costello's reliance lyrical eel's ies a from dium roc ese MN
 
-->

Latest revision as of 05:29, 28 October 2020

... Bibliography ...
727677787980818283
848586878889909192
939495969798990001
020304050607080910
111213141516171819
202122232425 26 27 28


Melody Maker

-

Blood & Chocolate

Elvis Costello

Simon Reynolds

Another one?! So soon?! How much quality product can a body digest in a single year?

Elvis Costello is undone by his own prolific stamina and consistency. A month ago I made an unlikely comparison between Costello and Cabaret Voltaire: the shared problem of routine brilliance. The possibility of his surprising us recedes because of his prior accumulated excellence. Each time, it becomes steadily more difficult to argue that you NEED another Costello record. But his fans aren't buying "surprise" anyway. Costello services a stable demand for one sure voice of sanity and compassion. It's a matter of keeping the faith.

Equally, it becomes less and less plausible to present Costello as the thorn in pop's flesh, a radical intrusion of intelligence, simply because these days he barely interacts with pop at all. Costello, all of us in fact, inhabit a little world that's drifted apart from the mainstream, a world whose parameters are night-time radio and the music press. "Progressive pop" occupies a different space to pop altogether, perhaps equivalent to that occupied by literature 50 years ago. Nothing is in jeopardy.

Everything valuable about Costello — craft, dignity, content, depth — actually disqualifies him from the pop race. Pop was always meant to be surface flash, rupture, contrivance, a spree of strangeness — not good work and firm conscience. Everything about POP! should be capable of absorption within a matter of moments. With Costello, you have to work.

So here comes a fresh glut of WORDS — a round of media hagiography, no doubt, plus a mass of artfully tangled statements for us to decipher. These days, when Elvis speaks out, the result is a prolix, purple sprawl of placenames and mixed metaphors, leaving only the vague impression that he's pointing the finger at something. Much more useful are the more private songs, like "I Want You," a stark, extended gasp of choke longing.

Elsewhere, Costello's writing seems to increase in opacity as he turns over and over his familiar concerns — domestic deceit, doomed relationships, bread and circuses, the hegemony of the trivial and the tawdry. You come to wish he'd be less zealous in his anxiety to avoid insulting our on American traditional musics, the stance is so fiercely anti-American that these roots musics and regional just as much under threat of extinct mainstream American culture (MTV, yuppie sensibility) as our own culture anti-modern cultures are a form of a Americanism within America, which we caaw on.

But such dissent seems destined to remain isolated and contained. No matter how he struggles to shake up the settled state of his career — this year's peculiar gambit of "murdering" the Costello persona — Elvis Costello is doomed to make only big splashes in a small pond, our pond. "Hang The Deejay" could well have been Elvis Costello's very own anthem.


Remainder of article unavailable.


Article.jpg
-
<< >>

Melody Maker, September 13, 1986


Simon Reynolds reviews Blood & Chocolate.

Images

1986-09-13 Melody Maker cover.jpg
Cover.

-



Back to top

External links