Vox, May 1993: Difference between revisions

From The Elvis Costello Wiki
Jump to navigationJump to search
(+text)
(formatting / default sorting / update index links +emphasis / standardize quotes, apostrophes +tags)
Line 1: Line 1:
{{Bibliography header}}
{{Bibliography header}}
{{Bibliography index}}
{{:Bibliography index}}
{{:Vox index}}
{{:Vox index}}
{{:magazine index}}
{{:UK & Ireland magazines index}}
{{Bibliography article header}}
{{Bibliography article header}}
<center><h3> An open letter to Mr. Patrick Humphries </h3></center>
<center><h3> An open letter to Mr. Patrick Humphries </h3></center>
Line 10: Line 10:
{{Bibliography text}}
{{Bibliography text}}


I always took ''Vox'' to be a sort of "Twilight Home for Distressed Rock Hacks," surely all this snide and hysterical language will wake the others and matron will be cross. I know that most of what ''you'' write ends up in the cat litter tray, but as this is a monthly publication I feel readers should recognize the dishonesty and distortion in your review of ''The Juliet Letters''. You ''may'' say that melodies do not appeal to you or are not good tunes, but you state categorically that there are “no tunes.Is it therefore a record of silence? You really should try harder to get these things right if you are to make a living at this “writing” business. What is more this is a lie. Your soul is in peril. Repent while you may.
I always took ''Vox'' to be a sort of "Twilight Home for Distressed Rock Hacks," surely all this snide and hysterical language will wake the others and matron will be cross. I know that most of what ''you'' write ends up in the cat litter tray, but as this is a monthly publication I feel readers should recognize the dishonesty and distortion in your review of ''The Juliet Letters''. You ''may'' say that melodies do not appeal to you or are not good tunes, but you state categorically that there are "no tunes." Is it therefore a record of silence? You really should try harder to get these things right if you are to make a living at this "writing" business. What is more this is a lie. Your soul is in peril. Repent while you may.


''The Juliet Letters'' is not some devious trick, pastiche or bored experiment, it ''is'' a beautiful thing. To “hear it” you need ears and you need soul. But consumed as you are by improbable indignation you do not even have the courtesy to acknowledge that many of the songs were written with or by members of the Brodsky Quartet. Such accuracy would no doubt undermine your neurotic theory that I have somehow betrayed my talent. Yet listening to this record will not somehow magically erase your copy of ''My Aim Is True''. Though your nostalgia is touching you are still a liar. For if there is anything “farcical” here it is the notion of being lectured on structure by someone whose idea of writing a biography is to paste together some old reviews and press releases and publish them along with a few dubious photographs.
''The Juliet Letters'' is not some devious trick, pastiche or bored experiment, it ''is'' a beautiful thing. To "hear it" you need ears and you need soul. But consumed as you are by improbable indignation you do not even have the courtesy to acknowledge that many of the songs were written with or by members of the Brodsky Quartet. Such accuracy would no doubt undermine your neurotic theory that I have somehow betrayed my talent. Yet listening to this record will not somehow magically erase your copy of ''My Aim Is True''. Though your nostalgia is touching you are still a liar. For if there is anything "farcical" here it is the notion of being lectured on structure by someone whose idea of writing a biography is to paste together some old reviews and press releases and publish them along with a few dubious photographs.


If words such as “nadir” and “dismal” are to be bandied about with the same inelegant abandon as “flawed” and, oh yes, “genius”, then spare me your fake pity or at least learn to keep your mouth shut when you clearly do not know what you are talking about.
If words such as "nadir" and "dismal" are to be bandied about with the same inelegant abandon as "flawed" and, oh yes, "genius," then spare me your fake pity or at least learn to keep your mouth shut when you clearly do not know what you are talking about.


You will, as always, have the last word but it is unlikely to alter the notion that there is nothing at all the matter with some journalists that a quick slap in the face couldn’t sort out. Not that the thought ever entered my mind. The future lies ahead.
You will, as always, have the last word but it is unlikely to alter the notion that there is nothing at all the matter with some journalists that a quick slap in the face couldn't sort out. Not that the thought ever entered ''my'' mind. The future lies ahead.


{{cx}}
{{tags}}[[The Juliet Letters]] {{-}} [[The Brodsky Quartet]] {{-}} [[Letters to the editor]] {{-}} [[My Aim Is True]]
{{cx}}
{{cx}}


Line 36: Line 39:
<br><small>Clipping.</small>
<br><small>Clipping.</small>


[[image:1993-05-00 Vox cover.jpg|x120px]]
<small>Cover.</small><br>
<br><small>Cover.</small>
[[image:1993-05-00 Vox cover.jpg|x120px|border]]


{{Bibliography notes footer}}
{{Bibliography notes footer}}
Line 47: Line 50:
*[http://theafterword.co.uk/content/banish-all-dismay theafterword.co.uk]
*[http://theafterword.co.uk/content/banish-all-dismay theafterword.co.uk]


[[Category:Bibliography|Vox 1993-05-00]]
{{DEFAULTSORT:Vox 1993-05-00}}
[[Category:Bibliography 1993|Vox 1993-05-00]]
[[Category:Bibliography]]
[[Category:Bibliography 1993]]
[[Category:Vox| Vox 1993-05-00]]
[[Category:Vox| Vox 1993-05-00]]
[[Category:Magazine articles|Vox 1993-05-00]]
[[Category:Magazine articles]]
[[Category:Elvis writes|Vox 1993-05-00]]
[[Category:Elvis writes]]

Revision as of 21:33, 29 September 2019

... Bibliography ...
727677787980818283
848586878889909192
939495969798990001
020304050607080910
111213141516171819
202122232425 26 27 28


Vox
Vox Record Hunter

UK & Ireland magazines

-

An open letter to Mr. Patrick Humphries


Elvis Costello

I always took Vox to be a sort of "Twilight Home for Distressed Rock Hacks," surely all this snide and hysterical language will wake the others and matron will be cross. I know that most of what you write ends up in the cat litter tray, but as this is a monthly publication I feel readers should recognize the dishonesty and distortion in your review of The Juliet Letters. You may say that melodies do not appeal to you or are not good tunes, but you state categorically that there are "no tunes." Is it therefore a record of silence? You really should try harder to get these things right if you are to make a living at this "writing" business. What is more this is a lie. Your soul is in peril. Repent while you may.

The Juliet Letters is not some devious trick, pastiche or bored experiment, it is a beautiful thing. To "hear it" you need ears and you need soul. But consumed as you are by improbable indignation you do not even have the courtesy to acknowledge that many of the songs were written with or by members of the Brodsky Quartet. Such accuracy would no doubt undermine your neurotic theory that I have somehow betrayed my talent. Yet listening to this record will not somehow magically erase your copy of My Aim Is True. Though your nostalgia is touching you are still a liar. For if there is anything "farcical" here it is the notion of being lectured on structure by someone whose idea of writing a biography is to paste together some old reviews and press releases and publish them along with a few dubious photographs.

If words such as "nadir" and "dismal" are to be bandied about with the same inelegant abandon as "flawed" and, oh yes, "genius," then spare me your fake pity or at least learn to keep your mouth shut when you clearly do not know what you are talking about.

You will, as always, have the last word but it is unlikely to alter the notion that there is nothing at all the matter with some journalists that a quick slap in the face couldn't sort out. Not that the thought ever entered my mind. The future lies ahead.


Tags: The Juliet LettersThe Brodsky QuartetLetters to the editorMy Aim Is True

-
<< >>

Vox, No. 32, May 1993


EC responds to the Patrick Humphries review of The Juliet Letters.

Images

1993-05-00 Vox clipping.jpg
Clipping.

Cover.
1993-05-00 Vox cover.jpg

-



Back to top

External links